Hi,
I am reviewing the following document:
One of the key-points is:
create a new topic branch based on the genodelabs/master branch. For example,
git checkout -b issue76
2 questions:
- should we target master? or staging instead? I see some evolutions between these branches (as expected) and I am wondering what would be making the merge process easier for the maintainers?
- the format for branch naming (implied) is the number of the issue, since in my case I am likely going to have multiple of those, would it be ok if I add a more human-readable description, something like
fix/issueXX-what_this_topic_is_about? this would help me keep track more easily.
side note:
- I have signed the GCA, (and so did Karin, working with me), we attached this onto NYCU email but some of our accounts of github/codeberg may leak our @gmail address instead, will that be ok? (I’ll add a Authored-by trailer in hope you can match them, and will try to be cautious about it though).
Also, would you suggest me to create a first topic on this discouse forum first, before starting an issue on github or codeberg to discuss? or go straight for the issue and keep the convo there?
I am hoping asking questions about the process is ok based on the last piece:
Please do not take the steps described herein too seriously. They are not carved in stone. If you have suggestions for improving them, or if you feel staggered by all those rules, please let us know.
Let me know your thoughts ![]()